Comments on: Zambian Economist Clarrifies On Redenomination Of The Kwacha

By: Dr Jacob Mwanza

Dr Jacob Mwanza — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:38:55 +0000

Choolwe Muzyamba is an Economist?
Article kwati ni answer ya assignment ku UNZA.

By: mbesuma

mbesuma — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:43:38 +0000

tuoneka bbwino twamene tundalama twanu utu

By: Voltron

Voltron — Sat, 29 Sep 2012 23:12:46 +0000

@ KAYA initialy K 1000 = R 600 S0, 1 R = K 1.6 meaning 1kwacha 6 ngwee.

By: ISAAC

ISAAC — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:56:36 +0000

good work guys.

By: KAYA

KAYA — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:41:37 +0000

Can someone plz help us clarify on exchange rates. For instance 1US$ will be equivalent to K5, what about the Rands, Will it less than the kwacha in value terms? Do your calculation and enlighten us plz. Just as one write said, plz cite where you got this info coz we know its not your own data.

By: brozber

brozber — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 04:49:10 +0000

young man a good piece of work but you can still do better

By: Maano

Maano — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:21:39 +0000

Choolwe Muzyamba,

Imagine somebody crossing out three zeroes from each denomination and abracadabra the dead weight if the notes reducing – real magic!

By: Shameless

Shameless — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:57:36 +0000

But i can’t see a K1. Does it mean we won’t have it?

By: Scholar

Scholar — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:56:48 +0000

@Financial Economist apo walasa. In fact, we are not redenominating the currency to some other name. It will still remain Kwacha. All what we are doing is debasing the currency not rebasing as we have been hearing.

By: Financial Economist

Financial Economist — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:39:11 +0000

A good piece but fellow Economist learn to cite your sources of information in your future articles. Downloading other people’s works from the internet is an offence and is tantamount to plagiarism. Also, further note that it’s monetary and not monitory. Good effort though l can give you a bare pass for lack of citations.